- DTN Headline News
Dr. Dan Talks Agronomy
Friday, November 27, 2015 2:33PM CST

By Dan Davidson
DTN Consulting Agronomist

A recent report from Michigan State University reports no significant yield response from applying gypsum (calcium sulfate) on soybeans. It's a good example of why we never want to depend on one year of test results. The same study in 2014 showed a 6-bushel-per-acre positive yield bump in soybean.

Gypsum does have its uses as both a soil amendment and a fertilizer. There are measurements and formulas to determine how much to apply to remediate sodium and salinity. It's when used to supply calcium and sulfur that there are no clear measurements on which to base recommendations, and in the case of soil, it may take as much as six to eight years to notice a difference.

I first applied gypsum back in 2004 on 80 acres. I applied a ton of synthetic gypsum (Procal 40 from Soil Solutions) and have continued that practice every third year as both a soil amendment and a sulfur source. I began to notice significant changes in soil tilth in 2010 -- six years after the first application. I have never tried to measure a yield response.

It doesn't surprise me that this study contradicted itself in 2015. James DeDecker, author of the Michigan study, stated that most soils in Michigan don't lack calcium or structure that requires gypsum remediation. However, he points out that the courser-texture soils (sands) could respond since they have a smaller CEC value and are lower in organic matter and won't mineralize as much sulfur.

We have known for decades that sulfur is mostly needed on course soils. With reductions in atmospheric sulfur deposits (thanks to the Clean Air Act introduced in 1963) applications of supplemental sulfur are most commonplace for all crops including alfalfa, corn and soybeans.

DeDecker said in his study, "Inadequate levels of available sulfur are not only directly detrimental to soybeans, but can also inhibit uptake and utilization of nitrogen by the crop due to the synergistic roles of sulfur and nitrogen in protein synthesis." However, soybeans are not as responsive to supplemental sulfur as alfalfa and corn.

In 2014, the Michigan study applied 1/2 ton of bulk natural (powdered) gypsum and increased yields by 6.6 bushels per acre. In 2015, they used a different site and applied Gypsoil's synthetic gypsum and Calcium Products' pelletized SuperCal SO4 mined gypsum at three rates. Yields averaged 37.4 bushels per acre with no significant difference between treatments, and the untreated control averaged 38.2 bushels. Tissue tests found all treatments provided sufficient calcium, nitrogen and sulfur.

DeDecker believes the responses relate to soil quality differences between the two sites and differences in texture, CEC and organic matter. The field in 2014 had a CEC of 5.1 and organic matter of 1.9%. In 2015, CEC was 10.5 and organic matter was 2%. As a result, DeDecker concluded CEC and organic matter might be able to predict deficiencies and gypsum responses.

It will take years of additional calibration work at different rates, sites and soil types to develop gypsum application recommendations. The Michigan State work seems like a good start, and I hope we keep working toward this goal.

To read the full Michigan State University article "Soybean response to gypsum is dependent on soil quality," click on the following link: http://goo.gl/…

If you have a question, e-mail Dr. Daniel Davidson at askdrdan@dtn.com


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Katie Micik
Markets Editor
Monday, November 30, 2015 5:42PM CST
Monday, November 23, 2015 8:36PM CST
Thursday, November 19, 2015 9:24PM CST
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Sunday, November 29, 2015 11:48PM CST
Sunday, November 29, 2015 11:19PM CST
Sunday, November 29, 2015 10:52PM CST
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Monday, November 16, 2015 7:04PM CST
Friday, November 13, 2015 2:41PM CST
Thursday, November 12, 2015 4:06PM CST
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Monday, November 30, 2015 11:01PM CST
Saturday, November 28, 2015 1:14PM CST
Tuesday, November 24, 2015 1:36PM CST
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Monday, November 30, 2015 9:30PM CST
Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:06PM CST
Thursday, November 19, 2015 8:00PM CST
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Friday, November 27, 2015 6:45PM CST
Wednesday, November 25, 2015 3:59PM CST
Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:14PM CST
Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:16PM CST
Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:47PM CST
Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:30PM CST
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:55PM CST
Friday, November 20, 2015 11:20PM CST
Friday, November 13, 2015 11:46PM CST
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Wednesday, November 25, 2015 9:44PM CST
Monday, November 23, 2015 8:22PM CST
Friday, November 6, 2015 7:02PM CST
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Monday, November 30, 2015 3:45PM CST
Friday, November 27, 2015 9:45PM CST
Friday, November 27, 2015 6:05PM CST
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Friday, November 27, 2015 6:55PM CST
Tuesday, November 24, 2015 11:10PM CST
Monday, November 2, 2015 3:59PM CST
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Monday, November 23, 2015 12:23PM CST
Wednesday, November 11, 2015 3:11PM CST
Monday, November 2, 2015 3:52PM CST
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Monday, November 30, 2015 10:14PM CST
Friday, November 27, 2015 9:27PM CST
Thursday, November 26, 2015 10:00PM CST
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Friday, November 13, 2015 7:05PM CST
Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:37PM CST
Wednesday, September 23, 2015 5:46PM CST
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN